The government, with its new proposals, is seeking fundamental changes in the labor market. By suggesting an increase in the duration of temporary contracts to four years and easing dismissal conditions, it appears that this action grants more freedom of action to employers.
Which side are employers standing on?
Supporters of these changes refer to it as a necessary step to modernize the labor market. However, critics are deeply concerned that these reforms may jeopardize workers' rights and lead to job instability.
With the increase in the duration of temporary contracts and the reduction of dismissal restrictions, the question arises whether workers will truly benefit from these changes or if they will merely become a tool for greater control by employers?
